Purdy v. Berryhill’s Empirical Analysis
887 F.3d 7 · 2018
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 75 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1382C (§ 1614 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Richardson v. Perales · Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Seavey v. Barnhart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected . . . to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[c]ontrolling weight ... to a treating physician's opinion on the nature and severity of a claimant's impairments if the opinion is 'well-supported by medically acceptable clinical and laboratory diagnostic techniques and is not inconsistent with the other substantial evidence' in the record.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“impairments in the Social Security regulations, then the application is granted; 4) if the applicant's”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.