887 F. Supp. 2d 999 - Dataquill Ltd. v. High Tech Computer Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 35 U.S.C. § 271 · 35 U.S.C. § 284 · 35 U.S.C. § 303 (§ 1 of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Further, courts have held that because [Patent Office] interim rejections are not binding, they are generally not relevant to issue of invalidity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he grant of a reexamination and interim PTO rejections,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“are not probative ... on the question of patentability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.