Ranier v. Stuart and Freida, PC’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2011
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pizel v. Zuspann · Pancake House, Inc. v. Redmond Ex Rel. Redmond · Grunwald v. Bronkesh · Hughes v. Mahaney & Higgins · 160 Wis. 2d 144 - Hennekens v. Hoerl
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The statute of limitations begins to run when the cause of action accrues. A cause of action accrues when a litigant could first maintain an action to sue-cessful conclusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wing v. Lorton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.