State v. Gomez’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 2017
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gardner v. Florida · Mempa v. Rhay · State v. Mincey · United States v. Story · United States v. Gonzales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[f]undamental principles of procedural fairness in sentencing require that a defendant have the right to examine and challenge the accuracy and reliability of the factual information upon which his sentence is based.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Weeks“A copy of the presentence investigation report was provided to defendant prior to [sentencing]. Defendant had the opportunity to examine the report and challenge its contents and recommendations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Weeks“[d]efendant had a full opportunity ... to examine and challenge all factual information upon which the court based his sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Weeks
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.