State v. Monette’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 447 So. 2d 1334 - Smith v. State · 475 So. 2d 599 - Pickron v. State · Melvin v. State · 436 So. 2d 803 - State v. Green · Jolly v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A motion to alter, amend, or vacate a sentence is the functional equivalent of a motion for a new trial and 'should be treated the same procedurally as a motion for new trial or a motion in arrest of judgment....'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“No motion for new trial or motion in arrest of judgment shall remain pending in the trial court for more than sixty (60) days after the pronouncement of sentence, except as provided in this section.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The State may file a mandamus petition challenging an illegal sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.