Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 887 SW2D 31 - Autran v. State

Autran v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Bauder v. State (1996), Johnson v. State (1995)

44 state decisions

370199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Katz v. United States · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · New York v. Belton · South Dakota v. Opperman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; and no Warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or things to be seized.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “The people shall be secure in their persons, papers and possessions, from all unreasonable seizures or searches, and no warrant to search any place, or to seize any person or thing, shall issue without describing them as near as may be, nor without probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “that art. I, § 9 provides a privacy interest in closed containers which is not overcome by the general policy considerations underlying an inventory.... [Therefore,] officers may not rely upon the inventory exception to conduct such a warrantless search.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.