Ex Parte Little’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
43 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably Ex Parte Peterson (2003), Resendez v. State (2009)
43 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Green v. United States · United States v. Jorn · Arizona v. Washington · Oregon v. Kennedy · Wade v. Hunter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“all a party has to do ... is to let the trial judge know what he wants, why he thinks himself entitled to it, and to do so clearly enough for the judge to understand him.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Moreover, to hold that appellant waived his objection [to the mistrial] merely by failing to explicitly state 'I object,' we would adopt the hypertechnicalities which we rejected in Lankston .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“less drastic alternative, a continuance until the missing juror could be located”). 66 .Downum v. United States, supra (internal quotations omitted). See also Ex parte Fierro, supra, at 56 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Garza
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.