¶1ORDER
¶2Movant appeals the denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following his plea of guilty to robbery in the second degree, § 569.030, RSMo 1986. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).