Hudson v. Hudson’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2014
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Luker v. Luker · Scoggins v. Timmerman · Beeman v. Beeman · Garcia-Otero v. Garcia-Otero · Kieninger v. Kieninger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to prevent a spouse from escaping responsibilities to support minor children, a court may, in proper circumstances, impute a higher income to a spouse if the evidence indicates he or she has the capacity to earn more”). 5 . We note here that the court did not have to explain why it rejected Estrada’s Form 14 and substituted its own Form 14 with the higher income attributed to Estrada.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.