Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 888 A2D 276 - State v. Cain

State v. Cain’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 2023

6 state decisions

40200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · State v. Cookson · State v. Hodgkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Our standard of review as to whether there was a constitutional violation in the sentencing is de novo. Review of application of discretionary sentencing factors is under an abuse of discretion standard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.