888 F2d 1394 Benavides v. California Department of Corrections
888 F.2d 1394
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Adam BENAVIDES, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee
No. 88-1558.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Oct. 6, 1989.
Decided Nov. 6, 1989.
Before HUG, FARRIS and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM*
The judgment is affirmed. We have reviewed the thorough findings of fact made by the district court and conclude that they are not clearly erroneous. Moreover, in its memorandum and order the district court applied the correct legal principles and standards. See, Fadhl v. City and County of San Francisco, 741 F.2d 1163 (1984) and Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 109 S.Ct. 1775 (plurality), 1795 (White, J., concurring), 1796 (O'Connor, J., concurring) (1989).
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3