Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 888 F.2d 68 - A & E Pacific Construction Company v. Saipan Stevedore Company, Inc.

A & E Pacific Construction Company v. Saipan Stevedore Company, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

888 F.2d 68 · 1989

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
January 2017
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 2017

7 federal appellate ·

701989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 48 U.S.C. § 1681

Relies on Sims v. Central Intelligence Agency · Allen v. California · Seawinds Ltd. v. Nedlloyd Lines, B.V. · Lawrence M. Fleming v. Department of Public Safety, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands · Merritt v. County of Los Angeles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “private antitrust lawsuits, providing instead for an administrative complaint and review process before the FMC, which has exclusive jurisdiction over such matters. Thus, while no private party may sue for damages or for injunctive relief under the antitrust laws for conduct falling within the purview of the Act, the FMC is empowered to order reparations, including double damages, to impose sanctions and penalties for prohibited conduct, and to file suit in federal district court against the offending party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.