Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 888 F.2d 720 - United States v. Smith

United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

888 F.2d 720 · 1989

Citation profile

86
cited by 86 later decisions
February 2012
most recently cited

76 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently February 2012 · most notably United States v. White (1990), United States v. Rutter (1990)

76 federal appellate ·

7701989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Mistretta v. United States · Rose v. Clark · United States v. Hasting · United States v. Otero

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(c) Statement of reasons for imposing a sentence. — The court, at the time of sentencing, shall state in open court the reasons for its imposition of the particular sentence, and, if the sentence— (2) is not of the kind, or is outside the range, described in subsection (a)(4), the specific reason for the imposition of a sentence different from that described.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) was imposed in violation of law; (2) was imposed as a result of an incorrect application of the sentencing guidelines; (3) is outside the applicable guideline range ...; or (4) was imposed for an offense for which there is no applicable sentencing guideline and is plainly unreasonable.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[A]lthough we assume the court believed the defendant's acts were beyond the norm for the offense as set out in the guidelines, without the court's enumeration of the factors upon which that belief was predicated, we simply are left to speculation.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.