Shades Ridge Holding Company, Inc. v. United States of America, United States of America v. Sam A. Fiorella and Shades Ridge Holding Company, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
888 F.2d 725 · 1989
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 9 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably Litchfield Asset Management Corp. v. Howell (2002), Edith Libutti v. United States of America (1997)
15 federal appellate · 9 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bibby v. United States · G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United States · Kelly v. Robinson · Smith v. Harmsen · Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“are so similar that the distinction is of little moment. The issue under either state or federal law depends upon who has active or substantial control.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The [district] court shall, after the parties have been duly notified of the action, proceed to adjudicate all matters involved therein and finally determine the merits of all claims to and liens upon the property, and in all cases where a claim or interest of the United States is established, may decree a sale of such property ... and a distribution of the proceeds of such sale according to the findings of the court in respect to the interests of the parties and of the United States.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(1) the control taxpayer exercises over the nominee and its assets; (2) the use of the corporate funds to pay taxpayer’s personal expenses; and (3) the family relationship, if any, between the taxpayer and the corporate officers. [Citations omitted].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.