Hanson v. Waller’s Empirical Analysis
888 F.2d 806 · 1989
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp. (1993), United States v. Frazier (2004)
23 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Security Industrial Bank · United States v. Rodgers · Monks v. New Jersey · United States v. Hickman · Moore v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“He may comment on the evidence, may question witnesses and elicit facts not yet adduced or clarify those presented, and may maintain the pace of the trial by interrupting or cutting off counsel as a matter of discretion.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]here a party fails to object in a timely manner ... objection to the alleged error will be deemed waived unless it constitutes plain error.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“interrogate witnesses, whether called by itself or by a party.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.