Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 888 F.2d 918 - United States v. Maynard

United States v. Maynard’s Empirical Analysis

888 F.2d 918 · 1989

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
January 2022
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably United States v. Victoria-Peguero (1990), United States v. Passos-Paternina (1990)

23 federal appellate · 3 district ·

29019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 955A · 46 U.S.C. § 70505

Relies on Wrenn v. Gould · United States v. Ayarza-Garcia · United States v. Mena · United States v. Canales

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A) a vessel without nationality; 2 (B) a vessel assimilated to a vessel without nationality, in accordance with paragraph (2) of article 6 of the 1958 Convention on the High Seas;”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(A) possession on board the vessel and production of documents evidencing the vessel’s nationality in accordance with article 5 of the 1958 Convention on the High Seas; (B) flying its flag nation’s ensign or flag; or (C) a verbal claim of nationality or registry by the master or person in charge of the vessel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A claim of failure to comply with international law in the enforcement of this chapter may be invoked solely by a foreign nation, and a failure to comply with international law shall not divest a court of jurisdiction or otherwise constitute a defense to any proceeding under this chapter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.