Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 888 F.3d 839 - Garber v. Menendez

Garber v. Menendez’s Empirical Analysis

888 F.3d 839 · 2018

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission · Pennoyer v. Neff · Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. · Gibbons v. Ogden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “tolls the statute of limitations for a defendant outside of the State regardless of whether he once resided in Ohio or not”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “draws no distinctions based on residency,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.