Grimm v. Plasma Processing Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Caperton v. Beatrice Pocahontas Coal Co. · Mullins v. Beatrice Pocahontas Co. · AFA Enterprises, Inc. v. American States Insurance · Pryor v. Calmar Steamship Corp · Caperton v. Pocahontas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“corporate activities test focuses on the location of the corporation's tangible assets”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Peterson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.