Holly v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
September 2010
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada Humboldt County et al. · Hardister v. State · State v. Bulington · Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] police officer's knowledge that an owner of a vehicle may not lawfully drive creates reasonable suspicion of criminal activity only where the officer has reason to believe that the owner is actually driving the vehicle”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Holly v. State · Armfield v. State“an officer has reasonable suspicion to initiate a Terry 3 stop when (1) the officer knows that the registered owner of a vehicle has a suspended license and (2) the officer is unaware of any evidence or circumstances which indicate that the owner is not the driver of the vehicle”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Holly v. State“We note that had the officer not obtained a physical description or other information indicating Wilkinson was the driver of the car, we would find the stop impermissible. ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Armfield v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.