Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 888 P.2d 1027 - Hale v. State

Hale v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2017

2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

70199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Brown v. Ohio · Missouri v. Hunter · Johnson v. Oklahoma · Ashinsky v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an act or omission which is made punishable in different ways by different provisions of this code may be punished under either of such provisions ... but in no case can it be punished under more than one[.]”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Section 11 is the statutory prohibition on multiple punishment, which is violated where a single criminal act gives rise to offenses which are (1) not separate and distinct, (2) a mere means to some other ultimate objective, (3) lesser included offenses, or (4) merely different incidents or facets of some primary offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “This Court has called Section 11 'the statutory prohibition on multiple punishment and held that Section 11 is not violated where offenses arising from the same transaction are separate and distinct and require dissimilar proof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.