888 So. 2d 122 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2008
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Benjamin v. Brown · Steinhorst v. State · 761 So. 2d 1055 - Freeman v. State · 471 So. 2d 32 - Tillman v. State · Peede v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to be preserved for further review by a higher court, an issue must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal or review must be part of that presentation if it is to be considered preserved.”); Johnson v. State, 888 So.2d 122, 125 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Martin v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.