State v. Howard’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2015
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Rideout v. United States · State v. Dorthey · 603 So. 2d 739 - State v. Lobato · 709 So. 2d 672 - State v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(4) Things said or done. The statements are events speaking for themselves under the immediate pressure of the occurrence, through the instructive, impulsive and spontaneous words and acts of the participants, and not the words of the participants when narrating the events, and which are necessary incidents of the criminal act, or immediate concomitants of it, or form in conjunction with it one continuous transaction. ■”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[I]f the inadmissible hearsay evidence is merely cumulative or corroborative of other testimony adduced at trial, its admission is considered harmless.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mier v. Bourque
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.