Burkett v. Gresham’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 550 So. 2d 986 - Ex Parte Bayliss · Thrasher v. Wilburn · 748 So. 2d 198 - J & M Bail Bonding Co. v. Hayes · State Ex Rel. Shellhouse v. Bentley · 362 So. 2d 880 - Draughon v. General Fin. Credit Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'The purpose of the clean hands doctrine is to prevent a party from asserting his, her, or its rights under the law when the party's own wrongful conduct renders the assertion of such legal rights "contrary to equity and good conscience.' " J & M Bail Bonding Co. v. Hayes , 748 So.2d 198 , 199 (Ala. 1999) (quoting Draughon v. General Fin. Credit Corp. , 362 So.2d 880 , 884 (Ala. 1978) ). It is well settled that the decision whether to apply the clean-hands doctrine is within the sound discretion of the trial court. Borcicky v. Borcicky , 763 So.2d 265 (Ala. Civ. App. 2000) ; Grant v. Smith , 661 So.2d 752 (Ala. Civ. App. 1994).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Shivers v. Shivers“[C]hild support is for the benefit of the [child] and not for the benefit of the custodial parent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.