Flowers v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2004
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Vidrio-Aleman v. United States · 799 So. 2d 966 - Flowers v. State · 887 So. 2d 316 - Hardy v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In Ex parte Gardner, the Supreme Court clarified the application of the August 1, 2002, amendment to Rule 32.2(c), shortening the limitations period. The Court held that a petitioner whose ‘triggering date,’ i.e., the date this Court issues a certificate of judgment or, in a case in which no appeal is taken, the date the time for filing an appeal lapses, whichever is applicable, occurred on or before July 31, 2001, has two years from the triggering date to timely file a Rule 32 petition.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dierking v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.