Larusso v. Garner’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 252 So. 2d 229 - Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. · 753 So. 2d 80 - Young v. Progressive Southeastern Ins. Co. · Crumpton IV v. Gates · Florida Hospital v. State Agency for Health Care Administration · 467 So. 2d 305 - Zorzos v. Rosen by and Through Rosen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In connection with the offer authorized by this subsection, insurers shall inform the named insured, applicant, or lessee, on a form approved by the office, of the limitations imposed under this subsection and that such coverage is an alternative to coverage without such limitations. If this form is signed by a named insured, applicant, or lessee, it shall be conclusively presumed that there was an informed, knowing acceptance of such limitations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Without approval of the form, SGI is not entitled to the conclusive presumption of knowing acceptance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.