Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 888 SW2D 417 - State v. Marlow

State v. Marlow’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
3
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 2018

19 state decisions

80199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Benton v. Maryland · United States v. Jorn · Oregon v. Kennedy · Wade v. Hunter · Illinois v. Somerville

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “serves to minimize the incentive to sandbag in the hope of acquittal and, if unsuccessful, mount a post-conviction attack on the jury selection process.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When the defendant is aware of facts which would sustain a challenge for cause, he must present his challenge during the voir dire examination or prior to the swearing of the jury, otherwise, the point is waived-This requirement of contemporaneous objections to the venireperson’s qualifications serves to minimize the incentive to sandbag in the hope of acquittal and, if unsuccessful, mount a post-conviction attack on the jury selection process ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.