Mines v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 2008
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Penry v. Lynaugh · Jurek v. Texas · Edwards v. South Carolina · Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. Thornburg · Payless Wholesale Distributor, Inc. v. Albert Culver (P.R.) Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Supreme Court's holdings in Penry, Graham and Johnson do not provide an analytical framework to determine when our capital sentencing scheme fails to allow the jury to consider and give effect to mitigating evidence . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Brewer v. Quarterman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.