Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

889 F.2d 1086

Docket No. 89-1467.

Collins v. Wilson State

This page is marked noindex.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1989-11-21

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Neitzke v. Williams · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Daniels v. Sowders

Opinion by Robert Allan Edgar · Decided 1989-11-21

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

¶1

Before MERRITT, Chief Judge, KENNEDY, Circuit Judge, and R. ALLAN EDGAR, District Judge.*

ORDER

¶2

This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and the briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

¶3

E. Tyrone Collins brought suit under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 against Ms. Wilson, a private citizen, and the state of Michigan, alleging that she had conspired with the state to provide false testimony in Collins's criminal trial. The district court dismissed the complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d).

¶4

Upon consideration, we conclude that this case was properly dismissed, as it lacks any arguable basis in law or fact. See Neitzke v. Williams, 109 S.Ct. 1827 (1989). A challenge to the fact of confinement is only properly brought pursuant to a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 490 (1973).

¶5

Accordingly, the district court's judgment is hereby affirmed. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

*

The Honorable R. Allan Edgar, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Tennessee, sitting by designation

/889/f2d/1086 · .json · Public domain