Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 889 F.2d 1352 - Irby

Irby’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
December 2020
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably Tanya Mixon v. The State of Ohio and Michael White (1999), Smith v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District (1997)

3 federal appellate ·

1801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. · Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al. · Washington v. Davis · Thornburg v. Gingles · Mansion House Center South Redevelopment Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he evidence cast considerable doubt on the existence of a causal link between the appointive system and black underrepresentation in Buckingham and Halifax counties.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “although blacks comprise a large portion of the population, they are not seeking school board seats in numbers consistent with their percentage of the population.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “between the percentage of blacks in the population and the percentage of blacks on the school board,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.