Snyder v. Ridenour’s Empirical Analysis
889 F.2d 1363 · 1989
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently December 2013 · most notably Bird v. Glacier Electric Cooperative, Inc. (2001), Yeatts v. Angelone (1999)
7 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Thomas v. Arn · Sloan v. Hicks · Hullum v. United States · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · McSurely v. McClellan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is of no legal consequence. Accord: Park Motor Mart, supra, at 604. Since Ridenour did not object to the magistrate's recommendation, he has waived his right to appeal the merits of the court's order adopting the findings that Indiana's workers' compensation law should not apply or that joint and several liability survives in Indiana. 2 18 Despite his failure to object to the magistrate's report, Ridenour contends that this court should reach the merits of these issues under the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Snyder v. Ridenour“Ridenour argues that this notice speaks in permissive terms and, therefore, does not comply with the standard of Thomas. 17 We do not agree. The notice given Ridenour states that any objections must be filed by a given date and that failure to do so may waive his right to appeal. We view the difference in the language used,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Snyder v. Ridenour“as insignificant. Carr v. Hutto, 737 F.2d 433 (4th Cir.1984) (per curiam), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 567 , 88 L.Ed.2d 552 (1985), so held. Carr also held that the difference between”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Snyder v. Ridenour
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.