Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 889 F.2d 1548 - Hayden v. Commissioner

Hayden v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
June 2019
most recently cited

10 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Sealy Power, Ltd. v. Commissioner (1995), Smith v. Commissioner (1991)

10 federal appellate ·

1801989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 162 · 26 U.S.C. § 163 · 26 U.S.C. § 167 · 26 U.S.C. § 183 · 26 U.S.C. § 212

Relies on Linkletter v. Walker · Konigsberg v. State Bar of California · White v. Commissioner · Godfrey v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue · Donald R. Campbell and Patricia A. Campbell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The threshold inquiry in determining whether an activity is a trade or business or is carried on for the production of income is whether the activity is engaged in for the primary purpose and dominant hope and intent of realizing a profit.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Section 162(a) allows deductions for professional and consulting fees, and travel and other miscellaneous expenses only if they are ordinary and necessary expenses incurred in carrying on a trade or business.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Section 212 allows a deduction for such expenses only if they are paid or incurred for the production of income.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.