Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 889 F.2d 562 - United States v. Casto

United States v. Casto’s Empirical Analysis

889 F.2d 562 · 1989

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
4
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

64 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably United States v. Ortiz (1992), United States v. Quinones (2007)

64 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

6301989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Williams v. People of State of New York · Mistretta v. United States · McMillan v. Pennsylvania · National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e must carefully examine all the facts and circumstances of the case in their proper context. The presence or absence of [a limiting] instruction is an important factor, but it is also essential to consider other factors, such as whether there was a proper purpose in introducing the fact of the guilty plea, whether the plea was improperly emphasized or used as substantive evidence of guilt, [and] whether the introduction of the plea was invited by the defense counsel....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Because it was reasonable for the prosecution here to believe that [defendant's] counsel would attempt to impeach [a testifying co-conspirator's] implicating testimony by questioning her about her guilty plea, it was also reasonable for the prosecutor to adduce this fact during her opening examination of [the testifying co-conspirator].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A trial judge is correct in allowing physical evidence to be presented to the jury as long as a reasonable jury could decide that the evidence is what the offering party claims it to be.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.