Bartholomew v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
889 F.2d 62 · 1989
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2017
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Lawrence J. Duriso, Cross-Appellant v. K-Mart No. 4195, Division of S. S. Kresge Company, Defendant- Cross-Appellee · Virdie L. Smith v. Brookshire Brothers, Inc. · Hernandez v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Supermarkets, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was that the police, pursuant to a 'preconceived plan,' would arrest any person merely because he was designated for arrest by the store [employee].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“acted according to a preconceived plan and on the say-so of the private actor, not on the basis of [the officer's] own investigation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“wholly based on any independent observations of the officers,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.