Dole v. Milonas’s Empirical Analysis
889 F.2d 885 · 1989
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably United States v. Munoz (2000), Linde Thomson Langworthy Kohn & Van Dyke, P.C. v. Resolution Trust Corp. (1993)
15 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 49 (§ 9 of the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1134 (§ 504 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)
Relies on United States v. Zolin · Colton v. United States · Tavelman v. United States · Baird v. Koerner · United States v. Hodge & Zweig
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) the attorney and client involved, (b) the nature of the document, (c) all persons or entities shown on the document to have received or sent the document, (d) all persons or entities known to have been fur nished the document or informed of its substance, and (e) the date the document was generated, prepared, or dated.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.