Williams v. Affinion Grp., LLC’s Empirical Analysis
889 F.3d 116 · 2018
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1693E (Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on Neder v. United States · McNally v. United States · Schmuck v. United States · Salinas v. United States · Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.