Caming v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 2255 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 31 U.S.C. § 5313 · 31 U.S.C. § 5322 · 31 U.S.C. § 5324 (§ 1354 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986)
Relies on Teague v. Lane · Rose v. Clark · Davis v. United States · Ratzlaf et Ux United States · Pope v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“undoubtedly [were] based on the knowledge that his conduct was unlawful.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.