Eaton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Jones v. United States · United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan · Zurcher v. Stanford Daily · United States v. Grubbs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Probable cause exists when 'there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.' " Eaton , 889 N.E.2d at 299 (quoting U.S. v. Grubbs, 547 U.S. 90 , 95, 126 S.Ct. 1494 , 164 L.Ed.2d 195 (2006) ) (emphasis added). The Court continued, "Significantly, probable cause requires only a probability or substantial chance of criminal activity, not an actual showing of such activity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“stated that drug traffickers commonly keep U.S. currency within quick access and maintain records in a variety of forms including ledgers, computers, cell phones, pagers, phone bills, and wire transfer receipts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“facts and reasonable inferences establishing a fair probability that records and equipment related to such drug trafficking were likely to be found in the defendant's home.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.