Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 889 N.E.2d 830 - Jackson v. State

Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2009
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Leon · Jaggers v. State · Hensley v. State · Methene v. State · Fentress v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “for concluding that probable cause existed. Id. at 238-39 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 . A substantial basis requires the reviewing court, with significant deference to the magistrate's determination, to focus on whether reasonable inferences drawn from the totality of the evidence support the determination of probable cause. Houser v. State, 678 N.E.2d 95, 99 (Ind.1997). Although we review de novo the trial court's substantial basis determination, we nonetheless afford”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he task of the issuing magistrate is simply to make a practical, common-sense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit ... there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.