Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 889 P2D 345 - Newell v. Nash

Newell v. Nash’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2019

9 state decisions

40199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gibbons v. Gibbons · Carpenter v. Carpenter · Manhart v. Manhart · Thompson v. Inman · McAlpin v. Hixon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because both parties sought termination of the joint custody arrangement, and because the joint custody arrangement was, in fact, terminated, the trial court was obligated to award primary custody as if custody was being awarded in the first instance. See 43 O.S. 1991 § 109(G). In reviewing such custody orders, deference will be given to the trial court since the trial court is better able to determine controversial evidence by its observation of the parties, the witnesses and their demeanor. Manhart, supra, at 1237.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If either or both parents have requested joint custody, said parents shall file with the court their plans for the exercise of joint care, custody, and control of their child. The parents of the child may submit a plan jointly, or either parent or both parents may submit separate plans. Any plan shall include but is not limited to provisions detailing the physical living arrangements for the child, child support obligations, medical and dental care for the child, school placement, and visitation rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Even if technically defective, the parties for two years treated the joint custody plan as precisely that.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.