State v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “a) There is no proof in the record that the defendant was served with notice of the court date for which the bond forfeiture was granted. LA Code Crim. Proc. Art. 344(b)(1) requires that such notice be provided. Absent such notice, under Art. 344(b)(4) the bond forfeiture is inappropriate; b) Notice of such is provided within six months from the date of the mailing of the notice of bond forfeiture; and c) For any and all other reasons which may be shown at the trial of this matter. Id.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 15 So. 3d 173 - State v. Curtis

2. “In the case before us, notice of judgment of bond forfeiture was mailed on June 10, 2003, the defense of insufficient service was brought on November 21, 2003. It is cleai’ly untimely and cannot be used as a defense ... Id. at 1033”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 15 So. 3d 173 - State v. Curtis