889 So. 2d 1093 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
26 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · State v. Oliveaux · State v. Weiland · 441 So. 2d 732 - State v. Lynch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An error in the defendant's right to confrontation is subject to a harmless error analysis. If a confrontation error occurred, a reviewing court must determine whether the error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. In determining whether the guilty verdict rendered was unattributable to the error the following factors should be considered: 1) whether the witness' testimony was important; 2) whether the testimony was cumulative in nature; 3) whether corroborating or contradictory evidence regarding the major points of the testimony existed; 4) the extent of cross-examination permitted; and 5) the overall strength of the State's case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a declarant is 'unavailable as a witness' when the declarant cannot or will not appear in court and testify to the substance of his statement made outside of court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he accused shall have a right to full voir dire examination of prospective jurors and to challenge jurors peremptorily.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Brashears
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.