Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

889 So. 2d 219

Docket No. 2D03-2972.

Strickland v. State

George W. STRICKLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 22, 2004.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-12-22

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 2005

3 state decisions

Relies on 796 So. 2d 572 - Patterson v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-12-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Celene Humphries, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

¶2Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

¶3WHATLEY, Judge.

¶4George W. Strickland appeals his convictions for first-degree murder and armed burglary, and he challenges the imposition of a discretionary cost. We affirm Strickland's convictions without opinion and reverse the imposition of the $150 cost.

¶5Strickland argues, and the State properly concedes, that the portion of the sentence requiring Strickland to pay $150 pursuant to section 939.18(1), Florida Statutes (2003), must be reversed. "Section 939.18(1)(b) allows the trial court to impose this discretionary cost if it finds that the person has the ability to pay the cost, and payment of the cost will not interfere with the person's ability to pay child support and restitution." Patterson v. State,796 So.2d 572, 574 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). The trial court failed to make these findings, and therefore, the cost must be reversed.

¶6Accordingly, we affirm Strickland's convictions and sentences, reverse the portion of the sentence imposing the above cost, *220 and remand to strike this cost from the sentence. The trial court may again impose this cost after complying with section 939.18(1)(b).

¶7Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

¶8SALCINES and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.

/889/so2d/219 · .json · Public domain