889 So. 2d 236 - In Re Comish’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “in his office — some 1,500 open files — at least once a month, he admitted that he never reviewed the Schmitt file and could not recall seeing many of the letters written to Ms. Gai by Mr. Healy and vice-versa. Unquestionably, the evidence in this record proves in a clear and convincing fashion that respondent violated Rule 5.3 of the Rules of Professional Conduct, which directs the supervising attorney to ensure that the non-lawyer's”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. In Re Mopsik

2. “and Rule 5.5(b), which prohibits the lawyer from assisting a person who is not a member of the bar in any activity which constitutes the unauthorized practice of law. In In re: Comish, 04-1453 (La.12/13/04), 889 So.2d 236 , we reaffirmed longstanding prior jurisprudence holding that such misconduct is”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. In Re Mopsik

3. “conduct is compatible with the professional obligations of the lawyer,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. In Re Mopsik