889 So. 2d 928 - Wallace v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Melbourne v. State · 642 So. 2d 542 - Abshire v. State · Cobb v. State · Hernandez v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he Florida Supreme Court specifically rejected the notion that all members of a protected class have to be struck in order for reversible error to occur. In [Abshire ], the supreme court stated that the fact women were seated on the jury is “of no moment,” because neither number alone nor the fact that a member of a minority has been seated is dispositive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“race neutral explanation . . . was not a reasonable explanation in light of the facts”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that prosecutor's use of a peremptory challenge was not pretextual”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.