Partney v. Reed’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2011
1 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cook v. Hoppin · Schwartz v. Lawson · Cummins v. Dixon · 437 So. 2d 112 - Brown v. Wakefield · Household Finance Company, Inc. v. Watson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Only evidentiary materials that are admissible or usable at trial can sustain or avoid summary judgment.” Partney v. Reed, 889 S.W.2d 896, 901 (Mo.App.1994).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Before a writing can be admitted into evidence its proponent must show that it is, in fact, what it is claimed to be.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“An indorsement has no effect upon negotiability, without regard to the nature or terminology of the indorsement”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.