Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 89 A3D 795 - State v. Dana Gallop

State v. Dana Gallop’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Simmons v. United States · Neil v. Biggers · Hernandez v. New York · Purkett v. Elem

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because the trial justice below similarly ruled on the ultimate question of intentional discrimination, we need not determine whether the exclusion from the jury of the only black person in the jury panel establishes a prima facie showing that the prosecutor exercised the state's peremptory challenge on the basis of race. We instead need only determine whether the trial justice erred in accepting the prosecutor's race-neutral reason for excluding the prospective juror.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]his step of the analysis will become moot if the trial justice moves beyond it to consider the second and third steps.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.