¶1The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations, including its resolution of alleged conflicts in testimony. The evidence established the requisite intent to defraud (see e.g. People v Rodriguez, 71 AD3d 450 [2010], affd 17 NY3d 486 [2011]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Sweeny, Moskowitz, Acosta and AbdusSalaam, JJ.
89 A.D.3d 577
People v. Stevens
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 17, 2011
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 2011-11-17
Decided 2011-11-17