Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

89 A.D.3d 605

People v. Rawls

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 2011-11-22

Decided 2011-11-22

¶1Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties; due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

¶2It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

¶3Counsel for appellant is referred to Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department (22 NYCRR) § 606.5. Concur— Moskowitz, J.P, Renwick, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.

/89/ad3d/605 · .json · Public domain