Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

89 A.D.3d 745

People v. Beck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 2011-11-01

Decided 2011-11-01

¶1We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which *746could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

¶2The defendant has not raised, nor could he have raised, any nonfrivolous issues in his pro se supplemental brief. Skelos, J.P, Angiolillo, Belen, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.

/89/ad3d/745 · .json · Public domain