State v. Simmering’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 2003
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Vallejos · Kinsey v. State of Arizona · State v. Sorrell · Singh v. State · Hash v. State of Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““You are instructed that the State need not prove that the crime charged was committed on the exact day or days charged in the Information. If you find that the defendant committed the crime as I have defined it to you, it is then sufficient, if the evidence shows beyond a reasonable doubt the crime was committed on or about * * *””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sianez““ * * * And, by a mere imposition of a defense of alibi, defendant cannot compel the state to elect an exact day.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sianez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.